Briefe von Alfred – haben Sie ihm schon geschrieben?

Lieber Henry, liebe Kinder!

Heute möchte ich Euch eine kleine Geschichte über Kinder und Orks erzählen.  Orks sind die Monster, die tief unter der Erde gezüchtet werden. Wenn sie reif sind, kommen sie plötzlich alle hoch und fressen Euch auf. Das kann man im Film „Der Herr der Ringe“ sehen.  Frodo, der kleine Hobbit, hat aber nie aufgegeben, diese Orks abzuwehren.

Das war nur der Vorspann.

Ich war noch nicht lange in meinem neuen Zuhause am Ufer vom Lech – indem früher auch Onkel Adolf schon gewohnt hat –, da kletterte ich einmal auf meinen Stuhl, um aus dem Fenster zu schauen, was es da draußen gibt. – Ich weiß, Hobbits und Kinder sind klein, was aber nicht der Grund dafür ist, daß ich auf den Stuhl geklettert bin, sondern das Fenster ist einfach so hoch.

Auf jeden Fall hat mich, was ich sah, bezaubert und fasziniert.

In meiner Wohnanlage war gerade Einschluß und es herrschte Ruhe. Mein Fenster geht nach außen und nicht nach innen auf den Hof, so daß ich sogar Bäume in der Ferne sehen kann. Ich kann auch Geräusche wahrnehmen, wie z.B. von den Dohlen, die sich im Dach eines naheliegenden Gebäudes eingenistet haben. In ihrer Vogelsprache reden sie ständig miteinander.

An diesem Tag hörte ich plötzlich Kinderstimmen aus der Ferne. Sie mußten von dort kommen, wo ich die Bäume sehen kann, hinter dem Sportfeld und den Zäunen.

So etwas hatte ich seit langem nicht mehr gehört – Kinderstimmen beim Spielen.

Sie haben bei mir, als ich wie bezaubert auf dem Stuhl stand und lauschte, Gedanken ausgelöst, die mir Kummer und Sorge machten.

Im Moment war es zwar um mich herum alles ruhig, aber wenn wir oder die anderen Etagen wieder Aufschluß haben, ist das Gebrüll der Orks ohrenbetäubend.

Die Ork-Sammelstelle, in der ich mein Zimmer habe, ist 4 Etagen hoch. Es gibt sehr wenige Hobbits hier, aber sehr viele Orks.
Der Bereich zwischen den Zellenreihen ist von einer Etage zur anderen offen, sodaß man von oben nach unten gucken und miteinander reden kann, wenn die Käfig/Zellen-Türen aufgeschlossen sind. Da man durch diese Öffnung auch jemand von oben nach unten entsorgen könnte, haben sie vor einiger Zeit Netze zwischen den Etagen gespannt, um runtergeworfene Orks oder Beamte aufzufangen. […]

An dieser Stelle möchte ich die kleine Geschichte unterbrechen.

Wenn Sie wissen möchten, wie die Geschichte weitergeht, schreiben Sie unserem Alfred doch einmal einen Brief… Vielleicht erzählt er Ihnen dann auch noch mehr von seinem Alltag in der BRD- Gesinnungshaft

Alfred Schaefer
Hindenburgring 12
86899 Landsberg am Lech

Karte englisch neu Mrz 2020




Renouf on Trial

Posted by in Dresden, Free Speech, Gerard Menuhin, Germany, Holohoax, jews, Lady Michèle Renouf, WW II Revisionism

I had the good fortune to meet the wonderful and kind Lady Michèle Renouf in Germany in mid-December 2017, two weeks before my arrest. She is beautiful in every sense of the word.

Two months later, February 2018, she gave an impromptu short speech, upon invitation, at the Dresden memorial, remembering the German victims of Allied firebombing from February 13 to 15, 1945. She was arrested (released later that day) and the event was shut down. My brother Alfred Schaefer was one of the scheduled speakers who did not get to speak, but in his words, the world-wide attention which Lady Michèle’s arrest brought to this horrific war crime against German civilians was worth more than a thousand speeches!

For an account of the Dresden memorial event the year before (2017), see my article here.

Charges have been laid, and Renouf faces the Inquisition in May.

I highly recommend watching the video of her speech. It is a powerful speech. Evidently those who make it illegal to criticize them did not like what she said to the people that day. Thank you Michèle for your outstanding courage to speak truth.

Screen Shot 2020-03-16 at 8.43.25 PM

The following report comes from Peter Rushton – it is about the impending trial, her speech and Michèle Renouf’s life.


Renouf on Trial – May 2020 – by Peter Rushton

Michèle, your fearless and direct utterances in Dresden, unfortunately forbidden to all Germans, blew open the window of truth in one blast.”
~ said Gerard Menuhin, son of legendary violinist and conductor Yehudi Menuhin, in February 2018
On 15th May 2020 an Australian-born Briton goes on trial in Dresden for “incitement” – not for terrorism or threats, but because of a 10-minute speech given to 300 mourners at a commemoration of the Allied terror bombing of Dresden in 1945.
The charges have been brought under Germany’s draconian volksverhetzung law – Para 130 of the criminal code, against Lady Michèle Renouf, former wife of New Zealand banking tycoon Sir Francis (‘Frank the Bank’) Renouf who was honoured with the Verdienstkreuz by the then West German government. In 1990 the engaged couple travelled to Bonn for the award of Sir Frank’s medal, and as his fiancée Lady Renouf was given a Verdienstkreuzlapel ribbon. This honour related to Sir Frank’s pioneering role in persuading the German federal government to relax its conservative policies and invest its financial surplus on world markets. (For similar reasons he was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II.)
In February 2018 Lady Renouf attended a public commemoration in central Dresden, marking the anniversary of the 1945 terror bombing by the Royal Air Force and the USAAF. Responding to an anti-British comment by someone in the crowd, Lady Renouf was invited to give a brief spontaneous speech in which she acknowledged Britain’s shame for its deliberate wartime policy of targeting civilians.
During this speech she referred to the following facts:
a) Many influential Britons at the time condemned Churchill’s barbaric terror bombing policy and the associated demand for unconditional surrender – such people included Lord Hankey (formerly Sir Maurice Hankey, founder of the modern civil service); the Rt Rev George Bell, Bishop of Chichester; Labour MP and future minister Richard Stokes; and government scientist and future bestselling novelist C.P. Snow.
b) The terror bombing of Dresden was a literal Holocaust in which tens of thousands of civilians were burned alive. We shall never know the atrocity’s exact death toll, because the city was packed with refugees – uncounted and undocumented – fleeing from the advancing Soviet Red Army.
c) The wider relevance of the Dresden war crime – Renouf emphasised – is that so-called ‘moral bombing’ of Dresden by the Second World War allies has effectively acted as a precedent for postwar crimes against civilians including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which in turn has prompted unprecedented floods of refugees into Western Europe.
d) The Allied justification for this targeting of civilians was that Britain and America were at war with Germany, yet this factor is ignored when discussing what has become known as the ‘Holocaust’, an unchallengeable dogma taking the place of history.
e) The simple fact that Jewish civilians were interned in camps is today regarded as a ‘war crime’ and part of ‘genocide’, regardless of what did or did not happen in the camps themselves, a topic which Lady Renouf did not address, knowing that it is illegal in Germany to debate such matters. It is odd to condemn internment itself as criminal, bearing in mind that both Britain and America interned enemy aliens. It is scarcely surprising that European Jews were placed in this “enemy alien” category, given the actions of the self-styled leaders of World Jewry who had as early as 1933 declared economic war on Germany. Moreover the future founders of Israel such as Chaim Weizmann were actively engaged in a campaign of covert warfare, some of it contrary to international law, in collaboration with Britain’s Special Operations Executive. In itself it was not unreasonable for the German authorities to intern large numbers of European Jews as potential collaborators in this covert war.
It is for making these points in her brief impromptu February 2018 speech that Lady Renouf was arrested and now faces trial in Dresden on 15th May 2020 for offences which carry a maximum prison sentence of five years.
Her trial will focus press and public attention on the extraordinary German laws that deny normal historical debate and rational argument. These and similar laws in many other European countries (though not so far in the UK) were condemned more than a decade ago by a coalition of eminent historians and other academics writing under the label ‘Appel de Blois’: these critics included the late Eric Hobsbawm; Jewish journalist and author Geoffrey Alderman; Italian historian Carlo Ginzburg; and the Oxford professor Timothy Garton Ash.
Lady Renouf’s own background is not as an historian, scientist, lawyer or politician. So how did someone whose lifelong career since early childhood was as a model and advertising actress come to be on trial in Germany charged with having expressed forbidden opinions and having uttered forbidden historical facts?
Born in 1946, Michèle Mainwaring was directed mainly to classical ballet studies from the age of 3 to 23, eventually for a licentiateship at the Royal Academy of Dancing in London. Her earlier four years of undergraduate art studies at the National Art School were partly financed by her parallel modelling career (beginning at age 7) and prizes in beauty contests, including winning Radio 2HD’s Miss Beach Girl, Miss Newcastle & Hunter Valley, and Miss Zhivago. (The latter title, twenty years later was to bemuse Dr Zhivago’s co-star Omar Sharif, when he and Lady Renouf enjoyed gaming at London’s Ritz Hotel casino.)
At age 14 Michèle Mainwaring was performing as Gretel in Hansel and Gretel at the Sydney Conservatorium when the world-famous former Ballets Russes dancer and choreographer Kiril Vassilkovsky came backstage seeking to recruit her “ethereal quality” for the role as Clara in his production of The Nutcracker. However her mother would not allow her to leave school to joint the company!
The young Michèle performed as Radio 2HD’s Shirley Temple, singing and tap dancing for the station’s famous children’s radio presenter Twink Storey as an infant performer and symbol of innocence in the postwar years. While the actual Shirley Temple became a US Ambassador, Lady Renouf in later life was to have a rather different involvement with diplomacy and politics – considered by some to have an ‘ambassadorial’ role as a champion for the rights of historical revisionism without exceptionalism!
The future Lady Renouf came to England in the late 1960s shortly before her marriage to the late Daniel Griaznoff, descendent of a Russian noble family. During the 1970s and 1980s she used her marital title of Countess Griaznoff in association with many charitable activities and became well-known in London society. Prolific romantic novelist and socialite Barbara Cartland delighted in entertaining Count and Countess Griaznoff at her country home. Actors Edward Fox and his wife Joanna David generously contributed their celebrated artistry to charity soirees and balls hosted by the Griaznoffs at their Hampstead home.
Meanwhile from age 15 Lady Renouf had been recruited into an international career as an advertising actress in television commercials alongside her modelling career. This led to magazine and television advertisements worldwide for products and companies as diverse as Deutsche Post, Tchibo coffee, British Airways, Cable & Wireless, Nissan cars, Lenthéric perfume, and hundreds more.  On screen she appeared with such legends as the Muppets and Dick Emery.
In the mid-1990s Lady Renouf become a member of the fundraising advisory board for the reconstruction of Shakespeare’s Globe on Bankside, chairing the principal fundraising event. As a professional designer of garden mazes and knot gardens, she had also designed an Elizabethan knot garden and labyrinth for the Globe approved by the project’s head Sam Wanamaker, intended as part of the re-education of the general public in the coded poetic messages of flowers, familiar to a Tudor mindset but now lost: her knot garden project was featured in a major article for the Sunday Times.
In this invited role Lady Renouf mobilised a range of contacts among London’s diplomatic corps (built up as a longstanding member of the Ladies’ Committee of the European-Atlantic Group) to assist in the Shakespeare’s Globe project, including Adm. William Crowe, US Ambassador and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who became a family friend; and Australian High Commissioner Neal Blewett. After completing raising funds for the construction of the Wardrobe of Robes room, behind the Globe’s stage (marked today by a bronze plaque) – Lady Renouf’s private tribute to her mother, who was a designer of ballet costumes – she also invited another family friend Buzz Aldrin, second man on the Moon, to include his contribution to a time capsule buried beneath the reconstructed theatre.
Oddly the first steps towards Lady Renouf’s involvement with “political” questions came as the result of a Jewish member of her Shakespeare’s Globe committee insisting on the entire menu at a fundraising dinner being kosher. Merely the appearance of a non-kosher item on the menu sent this woman into a rant about “tyranny” and “anti-semitism”.
Understandably Lady Renouf was puzzled by this inexplicable reaction, and this led her into further investigations of the taboo subject of “anti-semitism”. She carried out extensive research into the composer Richard Wagner’s attitude to the Jewish question, and in 1997 published the monograph Richard Wagner’s Art-works of the Future and Judaism: Inspirational or Conspiratorial.
At the end of the 1990s Lady Renouf visited Palestine with her high society chum the Bey of Haifa, Jeannot Khayat, who informed her for the first time about the outrageous “absentee law” whereby Palestinian homes can be confiscated by the Israeli state if their owners leave the country even for a holiday.
Early in the 2000s she met and recorded interviews with British veterans of the war against Zionist terrorism in Palestine, 1945-48. These included unique interviews by the late Phillip Knightley with British Army veteran and author Eric Lowe – now archived at St Antony’s College, Oxford. Some of these landmark interviews (in cooperation with anti-Zionist Neturei Karta rabbis, Palestinian diplomats, and commentators including Israel Shamir and Gilad Atzmon) appeared in Lady Renouf’s first documentary film projects, Palestine Scrapbook andIsrael in Flagrante: Caught in Acts of Twistspeak, screened at the House of Lords and House of Commons, under the auspices of Dr James Thring and Lord Stoddart.
In 2000 Lady Renouf attended the London trial of a libel case brought by the British historian David Irving against the Jewish-American author Deborah Lipstadt: this was the first she had heard of debates around the “Holocaust”, but she later became aware of a worldwide campaign of persecution against historical sceptics, notably the jailing of Ernst Zündel, Germar Rudolf, Wolfgang Fröhlich, Gerd Honsik, Monika and Alfred Schaefer, and Ursula Haverbeck – including their lawyers Horst Mahler and Sylvia Stolz.  In 2006 she attended David Irving’s trial in Austria, where he was sentenced to three years imprisonment, eventually being released after one year thanks to an appeal filed by celebrated Viennese attorney Dr Herbert Schaller. (In the recent film Denial, an actress plays the part of Lady Renouf, seated on the court bench as the sole observer on Irving’s side of the court throughout the hearings.)
During the summer of 2001 Lady Renouf arranged a meeting between Irving and Prince Fahd bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, eldest son of the present King Salman. Prince Fahd was owner of many racehorses including the 1991 Derby winner Generous, who was celebrated in a hillside maze garden designed by Lady Renouf, a friend of the Prince and Princess, at their Harewood estate in Surrey where Queen Elizabeth II had planted a tree. In a telephone call from Riyadh following their meeting, Prince Fahd confirmed his intention to purchase the entire property including Irving’s flat in Duke Street, Mayfair, and turn it into a “Real History Institute”, but he died suddenly a day later aged only 46.
One consequence of Lady Renouf’s defence of Irving was that a cabal of opponents engineered her expulsion from the Reform Club in 2003, following an earlier unsuccessful attempt to expel her in 2002 (when she was defended by eminent pollster Sir Bob Worcester). Lady Renouf had invited Irving to an event at the Reform Club (alongside family friend Count Nikolai Tolstoy) in the week of the Lipstadt trial verdict.
Since 2006 Lady Renouf’s Telling Films has produced many DVDs on the stifling of historical debate and the persecution of revisionist historians, scientists, authors, publishers, and latterly even their lawyers. These documentaries include Jailing Opinions, focused on the prosecutions of Irving in Vienna (Austria), Ernst Zündel in Toronto (Canada), and Robert Faurisson in Paris (France), and later documentary films such as Dresden Holocaust 1945 – An Apology to Germany is DueOut and Unbowed, about Ernst Zündel’s trials and imprisonment; Mourning the Victims, Naming the Culprits about the British torture centre at Bad Nenndorf (Germany); and many others.
In 2006 Lady Renouf attended and spoke at the International Conference to Review the Global Vision of the Holocaust, hosted in Tehran at the instigation of Iran’s then-President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The topic of her conference address was “Psychology of Holocaustianity” – an echo of her postgraduate studies in Psychology of Religion a few years earlier at London University’s Heythrop College. Veteran revisionist scholar and literary document analyst Professor Robert Faurisson said that he gave Lady Renouf’s speech “20 out of 20”!
Nominated by Prof. Faurisson, Lady Renouf was elected to serve on a five-member international fact-finding committee created at the end of the Tehran conference to advance research and support informed historical debate.
Between 2006 and 2020 Lady Renouf has been interviewed in many television and radio debates and discussions opposite (for example) Prof. Norman Finkelstein; former CIA officer Dr George Lambrakis; Dr Nicholas Kollerstrom; the Rev. Stephen Sizer; and Dmitry Shimelfarb, former adviser and press spokesman for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In 2005 she was honoured with the George Orwell Award by the Canadian Free Speech League, and has spoken at conferences in Canada, the USA and Mexico. Several of these speeches, films and interviews have focused on Lady Renouf’s campaign to raise awareness about the first, pre-Israel Jewish Homeland option in Birobidjan – the Jewish Autonomous Region created in 1928 in the former Soviet Union and still flourishing to this day in Vladimir Putin’s Russia.
When the Australian revisionist Dr Fredrick Töben was arrested at London’s Heathrow Airport in October 2008 and subjected to a European Arrest Warrant seeking his extradition to face criminal opinion charges in Germany, Lady Renouf mobilised a defence team that successfully opposed the warrant as invalid, forcing the German authorities to back down and accept his release. The Töben case proved an important precedent in relation to the traditional Catholic Bishop Richard Williamson, who was convicted in Germany for answers he gave to a Swedish television crew in November 2008, but who as a consequence of the success in Töben’s case, could not be subjected to a European Arrest Warrant. On Bishop Williamson’s return to London in 2009 he was met at the airport by Lady Renouf, who gave interviews to BBC Radio 4 and the World Service later that day, in which she debated the issues involved with Deborah Lipstadt and the late Greville Janner of the World Jewish Congress.
Now those same German authorities are seeking revenge in a wholly unwarranted prosecution of a British citizen for a perfectly normal and reasonable (though unplanned and unprepared) speech in Dresden two years ago, a speech intended as a humble acknowledgment of British guilt and contrition for a terrible crime against German civilians committed 75 years ago.
By this politically-motivated prosecution, the moribund Merkel government’s servants in the German state apparatus dishonour their own dead, and discredit themselves before the world’s media.
Lady Renouf’s former husband Sir Frank Renouf was a prisoner-of-war in Germany for four years following his capture after parachuting into Greece on 26th April 1941.  His time in an officers’ prisoner-of-war camp in Bavaria was well spent learning German from a friendly guard with the aid of Schiller’s poetry, building a tennis court, enjoying Red Cross food parcels, and conducting a correspondence course with Worcester College, Oxford, where he was admitted for a postwar degree.  His German connections were strengthened after the war as a friend of British Prime Minister Edward Heath and eminent figures in European banking including the British Lord Kindersley (a director of the Bank of England) and the German Hermann Abs (a director of Deutsche Bank). The Renoufs’ matrimonial home at 37 Eaton Square, Belgravia, had during the 1930s been the home of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who immediately before the Second World War rented out this same property as the home of German Ambassador Joachim von Ribbentrop – the first prisoner executed by the Allies at Nuremberg in 1946.
It remains to be seen whether 21st century Germany will be as hospitable to Lady Renouf as wartime Germany was to her former husband!
– Friends and international observers will be welcome to attend the trial. Twitter and blog accounts carrying regular updates on the Renouf case will be online soon; check for details.

Little Story – Big Picture

Posted by in Germany, Holohoax, jews, Letter, Schaefer – Alfred, Uncategorized

It surprised me to receive an envelope from the same address that Alfred resides at, so it was with great curiosity that I dove into the letter. What I found made me speechless. Truth is indeed stranger than fiction.

If ever there was a story about one man that is a microcosm of the world we live in, it is that of Daniel Alexander Strele.  Little story? Not at all! This one changed his life forever.

I have received permission to publish it.



Landsberg, 17.02.20

Dear Monika!

Alfred asked me to write you a letter and I gladly will do so.

But let me first introduce myself briefly. (I am not native in english, so please do excuse the mistakes I will likely make) [thanks Daniel, your English is excellent, but I will take the liberty to make a few little corrections~MS]

My name is Daniel and I’m one of Alfred’s fellow inmates. I am in prison since 5th March 2018.

I worked in a Liechtenstein based private bank.

Germany was accusing me of laundering money and tax evasion.

I got sentenced to 5 years and 2 months prison.

Once the trial was over, Germany wanted to send me to Austria to serve my time in an Austrian prison. I have an Austrian and a Swiss citizenship by the way. Within this process of sending me to Austria, the supreme court in Vienna had to review my case. They came to the conclusion that I should not be in prison and that I am completely innocent. In a phone call with my lawyer the Austrian judge who was reviewing my case said:

I have seen many absurd cases from Bavaria, but this is a totally new level of stupidity!

So of course the Austrian judge agreed to take me. But he also had to inform the German prosecutor, that once I set foot on Austrian grounds, I will be a free man because there will be no legal basis to keep me incarcerated.

What do you think happened? Make an educated guess! The German prosecutor drew back his application to the Austrian supreme court. Of course we are appealing the decision of the German prosecutor since it was him in the first place who wanted to send me to Austria. But once he realized that he will not be happy with the outcome he was back pedaling.

So this is my status quo – not very satisfying!

Alfred read the prosecutors statement and I think he couldn’t believe it himself.

I had a few talks with Alfred and I told him about my many experiences in my past with jewish people and he asked me to write it down (for you).

Back in high school I had a jewish history teacher! Do I need to say more – inauspicious!

Of course you can imagine what she was trying to teach us. She even said openly that her primary goal is to “realign our view of recent history”. Continually she was telling us that we should feel truly ashamed for our ancestors. Whatever topic we had in class, she always managed to circle back to WWII. I had a presentation about Napoleon Bonaparte – we ended up discussing Auschwitz.

We watched a documentary about ancient Rome – we ended up talking about how the Nazis were inspired by ancient Roman symbols and how they were misusing these symbols. (What a bullshit!)

I guess you can imagine what I mean. This lady was totally our of her mind. I had more than one argument with this lady.

Whenever I contradicted her stupid remarks she would totally freak out saying that it is no wonder that I am denying history since I was raised to have a “nazi mindset”. I always told her that I am extremely proud of my family and there is nothing to be ashamed of – I can track my family back to 1218, and to Widukind the Duke of Saxony. [I will ask Daniel for clarification of dates and will update this.~MS]

My family’s roots are in Brandenburg, a few kilometres outside of Berlin. Our family castles still exist. They are called the “Strele Burgen”. You might google it if you are interested in my family history. During WWII my great grandfather was the Reichsgauleiter of Vorarlberg, Tirol and Salzburg and his brother, Egon Denz, was the mayor of Innsbruck. After the “Anschluss” my family was visited by Adolf Hitler in our family estate “Villa St. Georg” in Innsbruck.


As you can imagine, stories like this – she did not like to hear them at all. At some point I was forbidden to speak about my family at all. There are many many stories I can share. This lady was just out of her mind.

So these were my first very negative experiences.

Later, when I already worked in the bank in Liechtenstein something remarkable happened.

One day, a guy named “Ari Silverstein” contacted me by phone. He told me that he is the grandson and therefore the heir of a man who has significant funds at our bank. He told me the name of this man (I cannot disclose the name since I am bound to the “Liechtensteiner Bankgeheimnis”). So I told Mr. Silverstein that I will check everything and that I will get back to him the very same day.

Indeed, the accounts were still there, although we never heard from the beneficiary since September 1945.

So I gave a call to Mr. Silverstein and told him I will need documentation to prove that he is the actual heir. I also told him that we last heard from the former beneficiary in September 1945. This was way past WWII.

He told me that he has all the papers with him. So I asked him to send me a copy of his passport by email. He agreed. About 30 minutes after the phone call was ended I received a scan of his Israeli passport by email. I replied and asked him for a meeting at our bank in Liechtenstein.

We are urged by the bank to handle cases like this serious and also as discreet as possible. It is well known that these people love every possibility to fabricate negative press and come up with “antisemite” allegations.

So about two weeks after my first contact with Mr. Silverstein a meeting in my office was set up. I was pretty surprised when Mr. Silverstein showed up empty handed.

After about 20 minutes of small talk I asked him about all the papers. Like death certificate, last will, …

He said that he has neither a death certificate nor a last will – he has nothing but a picture showing his grandfather. When I told him that this is hardly proof that he is the actual heir and that, if he fails to bring a documentation proving that he is the heir, there is nothing I can do for him, he totally went ballistic.

He was yelling at me:

Do you think they gave out death certificates at Auschwitz???

I started to laugh. He kept yelling at me and called me a “nazi pig”.

I told him, that even if all these concentration camp stories are true, the bank received a letter from his alleged grandfather in September 1945. So he must have been alive after WWII. Mr. Silverstein kept yelling at me:

I want ALL MY MONEY NOW! Or something is gonna happen!

At this point I told him that the meeting is over and that I am going to call security now to accompany him out of the building. Just when I wanted to take the handset of my phone to call security, he grabbed a letter opener that was lying on my desk and rammed it into my hand.


I started to bleed like crazy. Mr. Silverstein, instead of helping me, stood up and left the building as fast as he could. I somehow managed to call security and they called a team of first responders immediately. Once I was in the ambulance I fainted due to the loss of a significant amount of blood. I almost died!

Later the doctor told me that I was very very lucky, just one centimetre to the left and Mr. Silverstein would have slashed my wrists and I would have died 100% certain.

The hospital of course reported this incident to the Liechtenstein Police and they opened a case of attempted murder. They also put out an international warrant. A few days later the police found out that Mr. Silverstein, once he left the bank, drove to Zurich and got on a plane to Tel-Aviv the same day. When the Liechtenstein authorities contacted Israel to find out Mr. Silverstein’s address and ask for his arrest and extradition, Israel said that they will not cooperate.

At some point later I received an email from a guy named “Schlomo Goldberg”. He was, or still is, working for the “Central Committee of European Jews” (Zentralrat der europäischen Juden). He told me that I was reported by Mr. Silverstein for “antisemitic behaviour” and that I am on their blacklist now and that I am being “watched”.

Can you imagine? Don’t get me wrong, I couldn’t care less if I am on a blacklist or if I am being watched by those crooks. But still I couldn’t believe it.

I answered Mr. Goldberg and told him the story as it was. I asked him what mistake I had made. All I did was stick to the law. I never denied access to the funds – but still I need proof that Mr. Silverstein is the new beneficiary.

I also told him that there is an ongoing investigation of attempted murder and that there is an international warrant for Mr. Silverstein. Mr. Goldberg replied saying it was well deserved that I almost died since I was treating Mr. Silverstein antisemitic and that it is the only way to teach us! I was SPEECHLESS! And I still have the email in my inbox.

The court tried to subpoena Mr. Silverstein several times – of course with no success.

At some point the judge dismissed the case since it was virtually impossible to get hands on Mr. Silverstein. Hiding in Israel being the coward he is. Almost killing an innocent young man out of the greed for money!

In the court order to dismiss the case the judge wrote that:

it is very likely that Mr. Silverstein got a new name and a new passport by now and can travel freely wherever he wants. This is a common way for the state of Israel to help their citizens if they face ‘antisemitic treatment’. Therefore Mr. Silverstein will never show up in court to receive a fair trial and punishment.

Also it is said, what I find quite remarkable, that:

“this behaviour is typical and well known among most judges and prosecutors in the world. This behaviour is the lube of jewish profiteering. Enabling Jews to commit any crime they want, always backed up by the safe haven of Israel.”

I translated it from German to English as accurately as I could. I know the lines by heart. I have read them a million times because I couldn’t believe it back then and I can barely believe it today!

So, this means, if you are a Jew, you can commit any crime you want and you will get away with it? You just fly to Israel and those jewish crooks will give you a new identity and passport to “protect” you?

But indeed, I am in prison for 2 years by now. I have met many Muslims, I have met a few Christians. I also met several Hindus, Buddhists, all sort of people – you name it.

But I have only met ONE Jew back in Stadelheim [prison]. Alfred met him too. And guess why he was in prison? For fraud! Tricking honest German businessmen to give him their money… Is there a pattern? Definitely! Are people allowed to speak up? Address the pink elephant in the room? Never! If you do so, you will end up in prison, punished for doing nothing but speaking the truth.

Something is really rotten in this world!

I will try to get the court order as soon as possible and I will hand it to Alfred. The judge was really helpful and he was doing whatever he could to bring this cockroach in front of a jury – unfortunately with no success!

My dad told me once I have to see it in a positive way! True, I will have a scar on the palm of my right hand all of my life. But it will remind me every day that I almost died just for the greed of one jewish lunatic. I am reminded ever day how those people really are – how dangerous they can get if it is for their own good!

I hope this letter receives you in the best possible spirits!

Best regards!


Tea Time #2 with Brythonic

Posted by in 9/11, Canada, Ernst Zundel, Free Speech, Germany, Green Party, Holohoax, Immigration, jews, Psychological Warfare, Ritual Defamation, Schaefer – Alfred, Schaefer – Monika, Sylvia Stolz, Uncategorized, Video – Sorry Mom, WW II Revisionism

During 2018, Brythonic did many live-stream broadcasts with panels of people, about topics deemed politically incorrect. That generally means they touched upon the forbidden truth about current and historical events. I remember him as “the Brexit guy”. My brother Alfred was often on those panel discussions, while I was in jail at the time. His youtube channels were taken down, and after a two year hiatus, Brythonic is back.

I had the honour of being the guest for his second Tea Time show.

We talked about how it came to be that Alfred and I became political prisoners in that “freest land that ever existed on German soil” (according to Angela Merkel), what the end goal of all those lies are, how “they” are desperately trying to keep their flimsy house of cards upright, the need for Truth and Justice for Germans, and how the indoctrinated and manufactured white guilt has been weaponized against us.

We also talked about hope. Their desperate measures of censorship and persecution shows the power of truth, and that “they” are very afraid of the truth coming out, because the truth is what will cause their destructive program to fail.

We managed to frame the discussion in such a way that certain censorship-trigger words were completely avoided and yet the meaning can surely be understood.

Who is it that we are not allowed to criticize lest we be called anti-semitic?




Alfred Schaefer – der 2. Geburtstag im Kerker der BRD

Am Donnerstag (30.01.) wird Alfred Schaefer 65 Jahre alt. Es ist dann schon der zweite Geburtstag, den er im Kerker der BRD verbringen muß.
Im Juli 2018 wurde er während des Verfahrens, gegen seine Schwester Monika und ihn, in Untersuchungshaft genommen –  (Berichte zum Prozess finden Sie hier). Seit September 2019 wird er in Landsberg gefangen gehalten – angenehmer als Stadlheim.

Alfred Schaefer schweigt auch jetzt nicht, nicht mal aus der Zelle heraus. Er schreibt nicht nur an Freunde und Bekannte, sondern auch an die Diener Jahwes.

Weihnachten 25. 12. 2019

Gs Nr. 12 Vrs 22685/16-a-01 Brief Nr. 1

Liebe Staatsanwaltschaft München II

Mir wurde am 23.12.2019 eine Rechnung zugeschickt. Auch wenn ich könnte, würde ich diese „Rechnung“ nicht bezahlen, denn sie ist ein Teil einer Erpressung/Nötigung damit ich schweige. Hiermit weise ich Sie darauf hin, daß Sie sich selber gefährden könnten, wenn Sie als Komplize mitwirken.

Ich bin Politischer Gefangener. Ich befinde mich in Kriegsgefangenschaft.

Bisher war meine Kriegsgefangenschaft allerdings sehr positiv zu bewerten. In Stadelheim hatte die kooperative Belegschaft dafür gesorgt, daß ich mit einem inhaftierten Vorstand eines großen deutschen Konzerns viele 60 und 90 Minuten „unter 4 Augen“ private ungestörte


haben konnte. Besagte Person ist, so wie ich, ein Politischer Gefangener. Bei ihm geht es allerdings nicht um eine kleine Erpressung/Nötigung wie bei mir. Bei ihm geht es um Milliarden.

Die Erpressung/Nötigung gegen Audi/VW ist anzusiedeln in der „11. September 2001“ Größenordnung.

Hier nur ein paar Details:

9-11: Unmittelbar nach dem 11. September 2001 hatte Larry Silverstein vor laufender Kamera versehentlich zugegeben, daß er eine bedeutende Rolle in dem Terror Angriff in New York City, am 11. September 2001, inne hatte.

Und: Vor meiner Verhaftung im Juli 2018, im April 2018, wurde mir in tadellosem Zustand mein vorher „sichergestellter“ Rechner zurückgegeben. Hierauf befand sich unter Anderem folgende brisante Datei. Diese Datei war offen auf dem „Desktop“ und hat eine Spieldauer von knapp 2 Minuten, Sie war nicht zu übersehen.

Dieser Rechner war seit August 2016 in den Händen der Kriminalisten, nachdem unser Video

„Sorry Mom“ weltweit Aufsehen erregt hatte. Für „Sorry Mom“ saß meine Schwester Monika Schaefer 10 Monate im Gulag (Gefängnis der BRD Anm. d. Schriftleitung).
Die Staatsanwaltschaft und ihre Kriminalisten hatten 20 Monate Zeit um alle Einzelheiten genau zu untersuchen, die sich auf diesem Rechner befanden.

Und dann bekam ich einen Brief, daß ich einige „sichergestellte“ Gegenstände abholen darf. Meine Freude war sehr groß.

Die Datei: Larry Silverstein hatte in einer Rede vor seinen „mit – Gangstern“ in englischer Sprache, vor einem Hintergrund mit hebräischen Buchstaben, damit geprahlt, daß er schon im April 2000 die Pläne für das neue World Trade Center in Bearbeitung hatte.

Wo ist hier das Problem?

April 2000 liegt 17 Monate vor dem 11. September 2001

Anschließend kassierte Larry Silverstein Milliarden von der Münchner Rückversicherung. Auch wenn die gesamte, gleichgeschaltete Medien Landschaft mit gemacht hat, ist es immer noch Versicherungsbetrug. Da die Münchner-Rück in München liegt, und München in der BRD liegt, geht es uns alle in der BRD etwas an.

Ich könnte jetzt Bücher schreiben, aber fasse mich kurz.

Wir befinden uns in einem Paradigmen Wechsel von globalem Ausmaß. Seit vor unserer Geburt wurden wir alle indoktriniert und manipuliert. Aber nun befreien sich die Menschen in der ganzen Welt von dieser „Umerziehung“, „Re-education“, Indoktrination.

Es ist wichtig, daß Diejenigen die ihre Tätigkeiten in Organen des Staatswesens verrichten, diesen Paradigmen Wechsel nicht verschlafen. Der Zug fährt ab, mit oder ohne Sie, und hinterher gibt es dann Erklärungsbedarf.

Keiner kann mir sagen, daß der Staatsanwalt mir meinen Rechner „aus Versehen“ in tadellosem Zustand mit dieser, und vielen weiteren wichtigen Dateien, zurückgegeben hat. Er wurde mir zurückgegeben, weil die Rückgabe eine Art Versicherung war, für den Paradigmen Wechsel.

„Ja Herr Schaefer, wir haben dazugelernt und wissen, daß Sie Recht haben.“

Um verständlicher zu machen, was ein Paradigmen Wechsel ist, hier ein Zitat von Ernst Jünger – Der Waldgang (1951)

„Dem Machtkampf geht Bilderabgleichung und Bildersturz voraus. Das ist der Grund, aus dem wir auf die Dichter angewiesen sind. Sie leiten den Umsturz ein, auch den Titanensturz.“


„Es ist schon ungemein wichtig, den Bedrohten an den Gedanken zu gewöhnen, daß Widerstand überhaupt möglich ist – ist das begriffen, dann wird mit einer winzigen Minderheit die Erlegung des gewaltigen, doch plumpen Kolosses möglich sein. Auch das ist ein Bild, das immer in der Geschichte wiederkehrt und in dem sie ihre mythischen Grundfesten gewinnt. Darauf erheben sich dann Gebäude für lange Zeit.“

In diesem Sinne wünsche ich Ihnen ein Sinnvolles Neues Jahr

Alfred Schaefer

Kriegsgefangener / JVA Landsberg
Hidenburgring 12
86899 Landsberg

Nord Korea   BRD

Wenn Sie Alfred zum Geburtstag gratulieren möchten, schreiben Sie ihm doch eine Karte oder einen Brief.  Wenn Sie politischen Gefangenen – nicht nur in der BRD – helfen möchten, klären Sie die Menschen über die wahren Hintergrundmächte auf und nicht nur über die Symptome ihrer Herrschaft. Helfen Sie mit, Rumpelstielzchen endlich beim Namen zu nennen – denn nur dann verliert es seine Macht. Nur wenn wir endlich offen über das Judentum sprechen, werden wir den politischen Gefangenen helfen können!

Menschen wie Alfred Schaefer setzen ihre Freiheit und ihr Leben aufs Spiel, damit die Völker der Welt endlich in Frieden leben können. Sorgen „wir“ – die wir noch im Freiluftbereich des großen Gefängnisses verweilen dürfen – dafür, daß der Opfermut unserer Helden nicht im Chaos der untergehenden Zivilisation verraucht. Helfen „wir“ mit, den Niedergang unserer Kultur zu verhindern – sorgen wir dafür, daß die Mächte der Finsternis, des Mosaismus und Satanismus, ihr Werk nie vollenden können.

Freiheit für Alfred Schaefer,
Freiheit für alle politischen Gefangenen!




Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show & Alfred’s Birthday Coming Up

Posted by in CBSA, Free Speech, Germany, Holohoax, jews, Psychological Warfare, Schaefer – Alfred, Schaefer – Monika, Uncategorized, WW II Revisionism

Happy Birthday Alfred!

It will be Alfred’s 65 birthday on January 30.
Here is his address:

Hindenburgring 12
86899 Landsberg

Letters, cards, postcards are all very much appreciated. Even just a short hello – it shows the authorities that the political prisoner is not alone, and is not forgotten. Mail moves faster now, as it does not go through the prosecutor’s office anymore. “Only” the jail-guards open the mail now.

In the past the small cash donations by mail were much appreciated, but please do not send any money anymore, because the money will simply be confiscated by the authorities, to go towards court costs. They are aiming to make Alfred penniless. He does earn 1.5 Euros per hour on his prison job that more than suffices for his extra little expenses in jail.

It has been nearly a year since the great Andrew Carrington Hitchcock and I spoke – hard to believe so much time has flown by.

We spoke about the German so-called justice system and Par.130, which criminalizes the speaking of truth in court. So it is that the holohoax narrative is kept alive and well. Alfred Schaefer is just one of the wrongfully incarcerated political dissidents who dared to challenge the orthodox version of history.

The book saga mirrors the court saga, both being about the muzzling of the truth.

We also discussed the recent Virginia USA rally in which 50,000 heavily armed citizens showed up to give notice to Governor Ralph Northam that he is a traitor to the people and does NOT serve the people. The Governor wants to disarm the people, and we know where that has led to in the past. The rally remained peaceful, not a shot was fired, and the people cleaned up after themselves. The antifa were brought in, but did not get out of the busses. They left. The mass media has gone silent about this rally, because it did not suit their narrative. It was a good day for patriots.